Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 132(8): 888-894, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36082420

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) is a widely used technique for treatment of nasal obstruction due to inferior turbinate hypertrophy. This study aims to evaluate short and long-term outcome after RFA. Secondly, predictive factors for this outcome were evaluated. METHODS: A prospective clinical study was performed in 65 patients to evaluate short-term outcome and predictive factors (Study A). To evaluate long-term outcome and predictive factors we performed a second clinical study in 124 patients (Study B). Patients scored nasal symptoms on a 1 to 5 points visual analogue scale (VAS) and filled in questionnaires about their comorbidity, previous nasal surgery, and medication use. RESULTS: Study A: There was significant short-term (6-8 weeks after RFA) improvement in nasal obstruction (VAS -1.3, P < .001), trouble exercising (VAS -1.5, P < .001), trouble sleeping (VAS -0.9, P < .001), snoring (VAS -1.1, P< .001), and hyposmia (VAS -0.6, P = .004). Smoking (R2 = .065, P = .047) was a predictor for less optimized and previous use of decongestive nasal spray (R2 = .135, P = .005) for better short-term outcome. Study B: Nasal obstruction significantly decreased in the long term (1-5 years after RFA) compared to VAS before RFA (VAS -1.5, P < .001), but slightly increased compared to VAS 6 to 8 weeks after RFA (VAS +0.3, P = .036). Allergy (R2 = .066, P = .006), asthma (R2 = .068, P = .005), and previous use of corticosteroid nasal spray (R2 = .050, P = .016) were associated with a less optimized and older age (R2 = .217, P < .001) with better long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: RFA is an efficient treatment for nasal obstruction, and improves sleeping, exercising, snoring, and hyposmia. Predictors for good short-term outcome were previous use of decongestive nasal spray and no smoking. Predictors for a less optimized long-term outcome were allergy, asthma, and previous use of corticosteroid nasal spray. Older age was associated with better long-term outcome.


Assuntos
Asma , Ablação por Cateter , Hipersensibilidade , Obstrução Nasal , Ablação por Radiofrequência , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Conchas Nasais/cirurgia , Obstrução Nasal/cirurgia , Obstrução Nasal/complicações , Sprays Nasais , Estudos Prospectivos , Anosmia , Ronco/complicações , Hipertrofia/cirurgia , Hipersensibilidade/complicações , Asma/complicações
2.
Allergy ; 74(7): 1292-1306, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30644567

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The market of mobile health (mHealth) technology is rapidly evolving, making new mobile technologies potentially available for healthcare systems. Patient empowerment through self-monitoring of symptoms, shared decision making with the physician, and easily accessible education are important features extending the reach of mHealth technology beyond traditional care. METHODS: Two digital distribution platforms (Apple App Store and Google Play Store) were searched for currently available mobile applications (apps) for patients with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs). A new index (score ranging from 0 to 10) was developed to assess the potential of apps as a tool to empower patients through mobile technology (based on self-monitoring, personalized feedback, and patient education app features). RESULTS: One hundred and twelve apps were retained for analysis and could be classified in 5 categories: Asthma (n = 71), COPD (n = 15), Asthma and COPD (n = 15), Rhinitis and Asthma (n = 5), and Rhinosinusitis (n = 6). Eighty percent were developed by medical technology companies compared to 18% by medical doctors and 2% by pharmaceutical companies. Two-thirds of apps allow disease self-monitoring, whereas over half of apps provide patient feedback through graphs. Sixty percent of apps contain easily accessible patient education material. Only three percent of apps reach a score of ≥7 on the newly designed patient empowerment index. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of apps are available for patients with CRDs of which only few were developed by or jointly with medical doctors. The majority of these apps include self-monitoring tools, but only few also provide personalized feedback, which is needed to adopt these apps into daily care.


Assuntos
Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Telemedicina/métodos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Aplicativos Móveis , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Seleção de Pacientes , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Doenças Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Doenças Respiratórias/terapia , Telemetria
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...